Roots gracing the cover of In Style magazine is an international thing, I guess. I previously bitched about the US Uma Thurman Cover. But at least with Uma, it was only the roots that bothered me. Here's what is wrong with this cover:
1) They choose the fugliest person on the planet to helm their cover. I'd like to know what magazine editor's convention Dr. Sunken Tits slept her way through. First she gets on Blackwell's best dressed list (wa huh?), and then after Elizabethtown and Wimbledon flopped, she's still getting magazine covers.
2) They didn't airbrush out the roots the same way they airbrushed the rest of her features, so she could look remarkably human.
3) Is her hair supposed to look like a wrung up rag draped across her head? It has no shape and erratic texture. If this is their idea of "Glam Hair in a Hurry" - I hope they aren't going anywhere nicer than the supermarket.
4) Including the bitch on the cover, they have 69 Great Bags in this issue.